Why This Book Still Captivates Believers and Skeptics Alike
When The Case for Christ was first published in 1998, few expected it to become one of the most influential Christian books of the modern era.
Its author, Lee Strobel, wasn’t a preacher or theologian—he was an award-winning investigative journalist and a staunch atheist.
After his wife converted to Christianity, Strobel set out on a mission to disprove the faith using the tools he knew best: journalism, logic, and evidence.
But what he found surprised him—and the world.
The result is a powerful narrative that reads like both a courtroom drama and a detective story. It asks: Can we trust the accounts of Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection?
For millions of readers, this question—and Strobel’s honest, evidence-based pursuit of it—became the foundation for renewed faith.
A Journalist’s Journey from Doubt to Discovery
Strobel begins his story as a skeptic.
He believed religion was a crutch for the weak and that the Bible was a myth stitched together by ancient storytellers.
But when his wife Leslie became a Christian, he couldn’t ignore the change in her—her calm, her joy, her strength. That curiosity drove him to investigate Christianity with the same rigor he once used to expose corruption.
His goal was simple: debunk the resurrection.
If Jesus didn’t rise from the dead, the entire Christian faith collapses.
But Strobel’s investigation took an unexpected turn as he confronted evidence that pointed the other way.
The Legal Mindset: Building a Case
Strobel structures his book like a courtroom case.
Each chapter tackles one major piece of evidence—historical, medical, psychological, or textual—and tests it under cross-examination.
He interviews leading scholars, archaeologists, and scientists, pressing them with tough questions.
- Are the Gospel writers reliable eyewitnesses?
- Was Jesus really dead on the cross?
- Could the resurrection have been fabricated?
- What about contradictions in the Bible?
Rather than offering easy answers, Strobel presents methodical reasoning and expert testimony that mirror the discipline of a legal investigation.
The Eyewitness Evidence
One of Strobel’s earliest interviews is with Dr. Craig Blomberg, a respected New Testament scholar.
They examine whether the Gospels can be trusted as historical documents rather than religious propaganda.
Blomberg explains that the four Gospels were written within a generation of Jesus’ death—far too soon for myths to replace fact.
He also points out that early Christians preserved oral traditions with extraordinary care, ensuring consistency across communities.
Strobel realizes that the Gospel accounts bear the hallmarks of eyewitness testimony—specific details, minor variations, and honest portrayals of doubt and failure.
“The inconsistencies critics love to point out actually strengthen the case for authenticity,” Blomberg argues. “They show the writers weren’t colluding—they were remembering.”
The Corroborating Evidence
Beyond the Bible, Strobel explores non-Christian sources—Roman historians like Tacitus and Jewish chroniclers like Josephus—who reference Jesus, his followers, and his execution.
He’s struck by the fact that even hostile witnesses acknowledge the existence of Jesus and the early Christian movement.
This realization chips away at the myth that Jesus was a legend invented centuries later. The evidence for his historical existence becomes undeniable.
“If you apply the same historical standards to Jesus that you apply to any ancient figure, his existence is one of the best-attested facts of antiquity,” Strobel concludes.
The Medical Evidence: Was Jesus Really Dead?
Perhaps the most haunting part of Strobel’s investigation involves a medical analysis of the crucifixion.
He consults Dr. Alexander Metherell, a physician and engineer, to evaluate the physical process of death by crucifixion.
The details are gruesome but essential.
Metherell explains the physiological breakdown: shock, asphyxiation, and cardiac failure.
Roman soldiers were experts in execution—they did not make mistakes.
When the spear pierced Jesus’ side, the outflow of blood and water confirmed death.
No one survived Roman crucifixion.
Strobel admits that confronting this evidence was one of the moments that “cracked the armor” of his skepticism.
The Empty Tomb and the Explosive Growth of the Early Church
Next, Strobel tackles the resurrection itself.
Could it have been a hoax, a hallucination, or a stolen-body story?
Each theory collapses under scrutiny.
The tomb was empty, the Roman guards were competent, and the disciples had no motive to lie—they gained no wealth or power, only persecution and death.
What convinced Strobel most was the transformation of the disciples.
These once-terrified men suddenly proclaimed the resurrection boldly, even when it cost them their lives.
“People may die for a lie they think is true,” Strobel notes, “but no one dies for a lie they know is false.”
The Resurrection: The Heart of the Case
Strobel recognizes that everything in Christianity hinges on one event—the resurrection.
If it happened, Christianity stands; if not, it collapses.
He examines the evidence like a prosecutor.
Could the disciples have hallucinated? No—hallucinations are individual, not collective.
Could they have stolen the body? No—Roman guards, Jewish leaders, and sealed tombs make that nearly impossible.
Could it have been a myth? Not with eyewitnesses still alive and hostile skeptics converted.
The evidence doesn’t point to wishful thinking; it points to something unprecedented.
As one expert tells Strobel:
“The resurrection was not the product of faith. It was the origin of faith.”
This flips the common narrative—faith didn’t create the story; the story created faith.
The Psychological Evidence: Could It Have Been Mass Delusion?
Skeptics often claim the disciples experienced mass hysteria or grief-induced visions.
Strobel challenges this theory by consulting psychologists and historians.
Hallucinations, they explain, are individual experiences—one person sees something that isn’t there, not entire groups simultaneously across multiple locations.
Moreover, the disciples’ behavior doesn’t fit the psychological profile of delusion.
They weren’t expecting resurrection—they had fled, denied, and despaired.
Their sudden boldness afterward demands explanation.
Psychology, far from debunking the resurrection, highlights its improbability—unless something extraordinary actually happened.
The Transformation Evidence
For Strobel, perhaps the most compelling proof is transformation—what the resurrection did to those who claimed to witness it.
Cowards became martyrs. Skeptics like Thomas confessed “My Lord and my God.” Enemies like Paul became missionaries.
History records that nearly every apostle suffered or died for proclaiming Christ risen.
They gained no wealth, status, or comfort—only suffering.
“Liars make poor martyrs,” Strobel observes.
He concludes that sincerity alone doesn’t prove truth—but sincerity in the face of torture and death is hard to explain away.
The Philosophical Evidence: Can Miracles Be Believed?
Strobel also confronts the broader philosophical question: Can miracles even happen?
He interviews Dr. William Lane Craig, a philosopher known for his debates on the resurrection.
Craig argues that if God exists, miracles are not only possible—they’re probable.
The resurrection, then, isn’t a violation of nature; it’s an intervention by its Creator.
“The evidence for the resurrection is as strong as any historical fact can be,” Craig tells him.
This section shows Strobel’s integrity—he doesn’t ignore hard questions. He gives them a platform, and then lets logic speak.
The Verdict: From Courtroom to Conversion
After two years of investigation, Strobel sits at his desk surrounded by notes, transcripts, and unanswered questions.
He realizes that disbelief now requires more faith than belief.
The evidence had built a case he could no longer ignore.
Like a jury faced with overwhelming testimony, he reaches a verdict—Jesus is who He claimed to be.
His conversion wasn’t emotional—it was intellectual surrender to truth.
“I became convinced that the resurrection of Jesus was the best explanation for the evidence—and that changed everything.”
The Ripple Effect: Faith That Engages the Mind
The Case for Christ doesn’t demand blind faith—it models informed faith.
It invites readers to wrestle, question, and test, knowing that truth has nothing to fear from examination.
This approach resonates with a modern audience skeptical of dogma but hungry for meaning.
By blending investigative journalism with theology, Strobel bridges the gap between faith and reason.
Reader Voices
“This book helped me see that Christianity isn’t wishful thinking—it’s built on historical reality.”
“As someone who doubted for years, Strobel’s honest investigation gave me permission to explore without fear.”
“I expected apologetics. What I found was a story about courage, evidence, and personal transformation.”
Why This Book Still Matters
If you’ve ever wrestled with doubt, The Case for Christ shows that questioning isn’t the enemy of faith—it’s the pathway to it.
It’s not about winning arguments; it’s about pursuing truth wherever it leads.
And for millions, that pursuit leads not to religion, but to relationship—with a living Christ.
Strobel’s legacy is not that he “proved” Christianity, but that he made investigating truth an act of faith.
👉 Whether you’re a skeptic, seeker, or believer, this book offers something invaluable: the courage to ask—and the wisdom to listen.
Leave a Reply